Analysing Willfred Owens Dulce Et Decorum Est. Essay -- English Liter

Analysing Willfred Owens Dulce Et decorum Est.Dulce ET Decorum Est is an anti-war poem, which emphasizes the durability of war. The meaning of the ironic title roughly translatedinto it is good and honourable except is not fully established untilyou examine the poem. The full title Dulce ET Decorum Est Pro PatriaMori means it is good and honourable to die for your country. further the main aspect of this poem is paradoxical to its title. Thisdemonstrates the message Wilfred Owens is insinuating and his berth towards war.The poem is regarding Wilfred Owen and his troop of exhausted soldiersmaking their vogue back to trading floor after combat at the front line until a mess up shell is fired at them. A soldier is fatally gassed, is put in anambulance dying slowly and then eaten away from the inside.Owen describes a piece being engulfed by gas,Dim through the misty panes and thick discolour light,Under a green sea I saw him drowning.The death and distress is shown and the harsh a ctuality of waruncovered. It is almost as though you argon reliving the agony the manis suffering. The reader is nowhere near as unfortunate as Wilfred. Hewas repeatedly crucifyd by his experiences change surface after having toencounter them.In all my dreams before my helpless sight,He plunges at me, guttering, choking, drowning.It is an inescapable memory that haunts him even when he attempts tosleep, on unceasing replay in his treacherous mind. His feeling ofhelplessness from that mo workforcet were captured and frozen, herb of grace for nothelping covered with hope, the possibility that he was unable to doanything useful anyway. A sense of regret, disbelief and anger arereused in other anti-war poems that Wilfred Owen ha... ... aid the pain once and stillendured. Owen has created a way that transports the reader back to thescene of the poem. Using the effectiveness of the senses. He describesthe sounds, the smells and the sights just about to give the feeling thatyou witne ssing the happenings expressed.My final contemplations to conclude this analysis are not in despairbut queries, whether it is rhetorical or not I am not completely sure.The thing that concerns me is how the government send men off to fightwar when under the misapprehension that they are bit for theircountry? Do they have no conscious, no guilt in sending the doomedyouth off to their inevitable deaths? The decisions they makeplain have repercussions as do all decisions, but to knowingly denounce so many innocent people to physical and mental torture thendeath, to me is worse murder, is it not?